メガヘラクロスex

Analysis: All four front corners were checked for fiber exposure, rounding, compression, and lift. No confirmed handling defect is visible at the available image resolution; the foil artwork reaches the cut edges, so the perimeter rather than a printed border was used as reference. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.

Analysis: All four front edges were scanned from corner to corner for whitening, chipping, fuzzing, and roughness. No physical edge defect is confirmed; bright perimeter bands are consistent with holder reflection rather than coating loss. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.

Analysis: The upper artwork, central character area, lower attack panels, and perimeter foil were reviewed for scratches, scuffs, dents, print lines, and pattern breaks. No confirmed handling defect is visible, though reflection and holder glare lower confidence. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.

Analysis: The four back corners were individually reviewed for whitening, rounding, bends, and lifting. None is confirmed from the submitted image; the apparent rounded shape is consistent with the card's designed corner geometry and perspective. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.

Analysis: The back perimeter was examined for white flecks, roughness, chipping, and edge deformation. No confirmed edge wear is visible at the available image resolution. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.

Analysis: The back was checked across the upper logo, central Poké Ball, lower lettering, and all surrounding blue areas. The printed surface appears uniform with no confirmed physical defect. This face shows 9/10 because the overall grade is held at 9: one of the three independent evaluations scored the corners at 8, the edges at 8 and the surface at 9, noting light rounding (front), while the others scored it a 10, and Gem Mint needs the evaluations to confirm each other.